Friday, May 10, 2013

Google glass and Arthur C Clark's Childhood's end


Picture belongs to google not me



Almost a year ago to the day Google announced Project glass its new and futuristic product.
Sergei Brin brought a few extreme sports guys to dive with Google glass from an airplane in what we still consider the greatest demo of all time.
Brin promised developers would get the developer edition within a year or so, quite a few journalists and developers got their glass only in the last month or so.
The social media have been bombarded ever since with videos' pictures and first hand impressions from developers and tech bloggers.
Arthur C Clark the legendary Science fiction writer was know for a few scientific laws he coined. two of them are:
  • The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
  • Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
 It seems to me Google is trying very hard to live by those laws. that is why they are working on driverless cars and all sorts of technology that might be years from actual implementation in the real world.
Will project glass be another Segway? that no one really used? will glass be the first tech product since the first iPhone to change the way mobile technology works for the entire world?
Experts and journalists are divided equally between the two camps.
In 5 days Google execs will take to stage again for the keynote in Google I/O, they will show us their vision for the coming year or more. I can't wait.
Developing a product like "glass" is not entirely a technological project. 
When Arthur C Clark wrote his master piece "Childhood's end" he spoke about our first encounter with aliens (one of his favorite subjects), he described a reality where the aliens stayed above the world in their ships for generations until the world was ready to accept them without prejudices. They slowly "educated" the masses to accept them visually and socially.
When Google decided to develop "project glass" they faced enormous challenges.

  • How to avoid scaring people that Google will document their entire lives if they wish or not. 
  • How to avoid scaring the people around glass wearers that glass people are always videotaping them and recording them.
  • How to make sure that people will know when glass is used.
  • How to avoid making glass look too alien, we don't want Jeri ryan to sue them for 7of 9 copyright infringement).
  • How to avoid making glass into another "Segway" a gadget for the rich and not the masses.
I see project glass as one of the most important steps in the evolution of Google and I will explain why.
Google and Facebook are internet services companies. their major strategy is to provide excellent free services that everybody will want to use like "Facebook", "Instagram", "Gmail" and Android. they get their money by collecting data points on their users and translating those points into worthwhile data for advertisers.
If we are honest we must admit that rarely we do watch the ads on the internet.most of us have trained our eyes to detect "ad behavior" and no matter how aggressive  the delivery is we adapt out screening process and avoid it. we know how long it takes to press the "Skip this ad" button or we do other things while the pre roll is running on a different tab on our browser.
Google and Facebook know that too. They are working hard on products with such an upside that we will willingly share our data.
I know my readers are saying to themselves "I know how to work the privacy settings on FB", "I don't post anything on the Internet I am not ready for the world to know" "I use ad blockers" etc'.
To this reality Google and Facebook are developing products that not using them will effectively mean not knowing what is going on.
Google created "Google Now" with so many advantages, "Now" tells you in time to leave for the airport, when its time to go home and it is indeed useful. its not that useful that it turned into the social phenomena that Google needed to break out of the geek circle of influence into the masses.

Google Glass is the next step in the evolution, its a little tougher to get away from, a little more revealing. you only need to see the posts of +Gina trapani on G+ holding her smiling adorable baby while taking amazing pictures of her with glass. those are  indeed magical moments that are hard to capture without glass.
Google in order to face the challenges I listed above had to hand pick the first Glass explorers very carefully. they all got a lot of TLC and they all had to pay 1500$ for the privilege.
You might find it weird that Google charged money for it, the cost that is probably less than what Larry and Sergei have in the cushions of their couches. the 1500$ was meant  to first of all build a serious commitment of the blogger to the testing, second of all all those bloggers/developers had to justify the expense to their editors and/or spouses. This made glass something worth  doing a few articles on.
Lets get back to Clarke's childhood's end, Google and Facebook much like the aliens in the book are actually growing the next generation and not us. they want to slowly push toward a world where sharing is natural and privacy will feel like an archaic notion more suited for those tin foil hat wearing paranoids.

If you go into a Facebook page of an average 15-20 year old, you will see all his posts are set to "Public" and he shares his school and residence data freely. unlike tech savvy journalists he is not too concerned with identity theft, when you are young you have very little to lose in terms of property so you are not burdened by the need to protect it.
Glass is the first product since the iPhone that in my opinion can push Google towards where it want to go. That is why ads are forbidden for now on G+ and on Google glass. That is why there are limited voice commands that are more likely to work for everybody. Google designed it all so we don't get frustrated or scared of it. There is a light visible when you see someone using glass. That is Google telling us "don't worry, you will know if they are recording you".
The balance is very fragile, all Google "needs" is that a Kardashian girl will accidentally film herself in a compromising position and auto upload it to Google plus for all hell to break loose.

Robert scoble the scobelizer  shows us his glass

Google and Facebook  much like the Aliens in "Childhood's end" need to slowly prepare the world to the next stage of sharing. Will glass be so "Cool" we can't resist it? Will we give all shred of our privacy for a shining wearable tech or a shiny touch screen?
Google and Facebook are trying to procure the kind of future that lets them lead it. its not just their future they are trying to protect. The future of all free internet services is on the line.
More and more services are going behind a pay wall and they need a good financial reason to stay free and allow access to us and Google.

On Arthur C clark tombstone he wanted to say "Here lies Arthur Clarke. He never grew up, but didn't stop growing" That is how the tech world is evolving and that is who we are or aspire to be.

This article is a a translation I did from my hebrew article with slight changes to better fit the English language.
The original article can be found here: link

This article is copyright protected and any rebroadcast of it forbidden without approval from the owner.














Thursday, May 19, 2011

Review: Samsung Galaxy S II



The Galaxy S II is probably the most talked about phone in the Cellular blogosphere for a while now, One of the reasons that Samsung can create such a buzz is their Agility and time to market speed. From the time Samsung recognizes new technology and until they release a product is nothing short of incredible. We saw previous testimony when Samsung saw the Ipad2 release and in less than one month they announced a thinner and stronger tablet and even managed to get a working version to Google I/O, you don't get a more judgmental and hard to please crowd than Android developers.
When Motorola announced the Atrix 4G and LG announced the Optimus 2X it was again clear to Samsung they would have to top those two super-phones.
On the move Samsung changed the specs from Dual core 1GHZ to Dual core 1.2 GHZ. Motorola promised future fix for 1080P video and Samsung delivered it on launch. Samsung was already a industry leader in mobile display with their gorgeous Super amoled display and they improved upon it with Super Amoled plus.
The Galaxy S II had two though hurdles to overcome from its predecessor The slow and buggy RFS  file system and the almost none working GPS. both of were replaced to EXT4 and a good GPS chip in the S-II. Samsung already released one major patch for the phone and a firmware update for the camera. so we can see that they are serious about updates this time.
The Hardware:

  • Processor - Dual-core 1.2GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor Mali-400MP GPU with Orion chip-set
  • Memory - 1 GB of RAM and 16GB of internal Nand storage.
  • Display - 4.3 inch Super Amoled Plus with 800*480 resolution and Gorilla glass protection.
  • Camera - 8.0 Mega Pixel Rear camera with 1080P video, front Camera with 2 Mega pixel.
  • Wireless Network adapter B/G/N
  • FM radio
  • Battery - 1650 MAH
  • GPS - AGPS
  • Weight - 116 GR
  • Internal video codec support for MP4/DivX/XviD/WMV/H.264
  • SAR ratings of 0.338  European standard.



The story of the hardware on the S-II is very impressive, The Sony Xperia Arc might be thinner, The resolution and speaker on the Atrix 4G are better, But there is no better total package of hardware than the Galaxy S-II. It is screamingly fast, it has a phenomenal screen even in daylight. Plenty of user available memory (~833MB), The camera is excellent. It is very thin. Industrial design in the eyes of the Samsung engineers consists of a black slab with no character They could take lessons from Sony in that department. 
The front Home button is great, the volume buttons are too small and located on the left which is not ideal for right handed people. the power button not unlike the nexus S is too small and hard to reach in a case. The S-II has a great SAR rating less than a third of the amount in the Atrix 4G. The phones like its on steroids, the reaction of the touch screen and the performance is all I wanted it to be. after Android will support multi core functionality this phone will be even faster. The battery is OK but far from great. as you can see in the screenshot above at 9:00 PM I was at 37 percent and it wasn't a heavy use day, no video playing or games. all in all top notch hardware.

















Software and OS

software with Samsung is always a mixed review, On the one hand they launched touchwiz 4.0 and as you can see in the pictures above it consists of many cool surprises, from a preview to the widgets and to a live wallpaper that adjust according to the weather forecast. Samsung also gave us a nice photo editor and a video maker ( mostly trimming) that allows adding pictured and videos with soundtrack to create a YouTube video and upload it directly. that's just another place where Samsung copies Apple with its iMovie app. sadly Samsung removed the option to resort the app drawer according to name or date.the initial ROM came with KDD version and the browser kept freezing on me and the "android process" kept eating the battery. I updated to KE2 vie "Kies" which reduced the freezing but I had to use an XDA hack to eliminate them completely. One new addition is SMS sync, it copies your text messages into your inbox and lets you use your e-mail account to backup your text messages.
to summarize the software there is definite improvement from touchwiz 3 it is much more usable and the additional software makes it a complete cellular package. The S-II comes with Android 2.3.3 which the one before last of the Google updates, in fact the only phones which are more updated for now are the Google Nexus ones. I hope the browser and battery glitches will be fixed soon, as much as I love XDA, 95% percent of people are running the stock version.









The Camera:

The camera on the Galaxy S-II is superb as you can see from the photos above, it includes many options from light settings to Panoramic option, photos taken in daylight turned out great, in low light it is not as good as the Xperia Arc ones. I wish they left a hardware button for the camera. The image stabilizer works great even with my shaky camera work. the 1080P  is crisp and well done. ( samples above)

Atrix 4G on top and the galaxy S II below

galaxy s II on top and Sony Xperia Arc below





Atrix 4G VS Galaxy S-II

The toughest part of his review is the comparison part to the competition, there are only two other phones in this dual core level and I only had one to compare and contrast.

  • Display - The Samsung screen is much better in direct sunlight, The Atrix has a better resolution with QHD (960-540) which leads to better internet browsing experience. at the home screens and picture/video the Amoled screen really shines. The atrix has a much stronger brightness level. The samsung wins here.
  • OS - Atrix 4G comes with Froyo 2.2.2,   the Samsung comes with 2.3.3 with the improved garbage collector, while both phones still await ice cream sandwich to utilize the multicore to its potential.
  • Performance - The Samsung kills in every benchmark as you can see in the pictures, in heavy duty graphic games the atrix felt faster despite scoring lower on the benchmarks. both phones are extremely fast.
  • Camera - The Samsung camera is better in every aspect even with the XDA hack to allow 1080P on the Atrix the camera on the Samsung is far superior.
  • Video out - The Atrix supports HDMI out with supplied cable, and can be hacked to HDMI mirroring. The Samsung supports HDMI over an MHL cable which is not supplied and you need and adapter to charge during use.
  • Size and weight - The Atrix utilizes its screen better with very narrow margins, the Samsung is bigger and clunkier. The Samsung is 116 grams while the Atrix is 135 grams. so bigger and lighter wins :-)
  • Speaker - The atrix speaker is stronger and clearer, the Samsung one is fine but not as good.
  • Community friendly - The Samsung comes with unlocked bootloader and with sideloading enabled, the Atrix is one of the most locked and unfriendly phones you can find. in this blog we support open devices!
  • Skin - The touchwiz is full of advantages and its starting to close on the HTC sense, the Motoblur is not usable and slow.
I can spell out feature by feature but I don't think you would chose between them according to features The Atrix has been modified so heavily from stock android that many apps don't work on it from Droidwall to almost all screen capture apps. The locking of the boot-loader is annoying. on the other hand the heavy customizations give you a solid phone with little to no bugs at lunch. Motorola is much closer to Sony and apple in that aspect. The Samsung is much more polished and open, it has much better added software and superior camera. weight and size are a matter of taste. you have to chose which features are more important for you.

Wrap up

The galaxy s II is a great phone, touchwiz 4.0 is a much better experience than previous Samsung phones. Samsung fixed all the things that annoyed me on the first galaxy S line. I still don't like the plastic feel of it although it is also much better than its predecessor. I can easily recommend the S II as one of the two best phones in the world right now.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Motorola Atrix 4G finally has 1080P video

After its been months since Motorola promised us 1080P video the guys at XDA-developers got tired of waiting.
A user named Zove modified the olympuscamera.apk file to allow for 1080 Video.
You can find details in this link.
Here is a sample video I took with those settings on my Atrix: